A latent fury at Israel shows its ugly head in Turkey


Relations between the two countries have never been this low
An-Israeli-commando-as-he-006Israeli flags were burned in Istanbul, tens of thousands of Israeli tourists cancelled Turkish holiday reservations and a lawyer attempted to punch an Israeli cyclist off his bike today, as relations between the erstwhile allies plunged to depths not seen in decades.

It was sparked by Israel’s interception of a flotilla of ships led by the Turkish Mavi Marmara more than twelve hours ago, but there is very little we know for certain beyond that. We know the Israel Defence Forces stormed the ships with commandos in the dead of the night, but we don’t know precisely what happened on board, and who provoked whom. We know several people have died, largely Turkish citizens, but don’t know how many. We also know that the Israeli government has been vocal in justifying its actions: the flotilla was warned, it was invited to dock at an Israeli port, weapons were concealed on board the ships, are among their claims.

The anger in Turkey is palpable. The interception came literally hours after seven Turkish soldiers were killed in an attack by PKK separatists on a navy base in İskenderun. But this morning’s flotilla incident has done more than compound anger at that attack. A latent fury at Israel has shown its ugly head in Turkey.

It had been brewing for months, probably since Israel’s Gaza offensive in January 2009. It was in response to this that Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan stormed off stage at a debate with the Israeli president at the World Economic Forum, almost causing a diplomatic incident but generating much acclaim back home.

A year later, I expressed concern about how an actual diplomatic incident – involving a Turkish TV drama and the Israeli deputy foreign minister – indicated two worrying trends: first, a mutual lack of respect at the highest level of Turkish-Israeli relations, and second, the growing popular resentment of Israel in Turkish public opinion. “The episode has injected further tension into the already icy relationship,” I wrote at the time.

The first trend has certainly deteriorated. Mr Erdoğan described this morning’s operation as “an act of state terrorism”. His deputy, Bülent Arınç, used a press conference to demand the immediate return of those members of crew being treated in Israeli hospitals – almost as if they were hostages. The Turkish ambassador to Tel Aviv has been recalled to Ankara for consultations for the second time this year. And Ahmet Davutoğlu, foreign minister, is in New York right now, preparing to table the matter at the UN Security Council. How far old friends can fall.

Things are also far worse in terms of the Turkish public’s attitude to Israel. Most will now have seen pictures of the thousands who filled Istanbul’s streets this afteroon. Flags were burnt; sections of the crowd shouted for retribution. Too often for comfort, the words “Israeli” and “Jew” were used interchangeably.

Turkish police today provided increased protection to the Israeli team at a cycle tour in Tekirdağ, in the country’s northwest. The added measures seemed justified: a local lawyer sporting a Palestinian flag attempted to punch a passing Israeli cyclist off his bike. And the anger exists in reverse too: in a matter of hours today, tens of thousands of would-be Israeli tourists cancelled holiday reservations to towns in southwest Turkey.

Things are bad, far worse today than they were in January.

I don’t think I need to get into culpability at this stage. The grainy mobile phone footage and limited Israeli army videos we have all seen so far tell their own story. Amos Harel, writing in Haaretz, makes the important point that the commandos themselves are not to blame, at least not as much as those who decided to launch the botched operation.

How can Turkish-Israeli relations be rebuilt from this?

(Image from guardian.co.uk)

Last modified: Saturday 6 June 2015

6 Responses to :
A latent fury at Israel shows its ugly head in Turkey

  1. Anonymous says:

    Is Democratic Turkey on the way to becoming an Islamic republic?

    Turning a democracy into dictatorship – a to do list

    1.Enforce the national feelings of the nation; make use of the nation’s history, religion, culture and all that increases the nation’ self esteem
    2.Find a common threat or a common enemy, threatening the morality or the dignity or the well being of the nation.
    3.Position yourself as the strong leader who is guarding the interests and the dignity of the nation, that is currently at peril
    4.Prepare the ground for the case where controlled must be seized for the benefit of the nation. This can be done by inserting people in key positions (e.g. the army, General Security Service, police force, judiciary…) or changing pivotal rules hindering the ability to protect the democracy
    5.Create a big incident, floating the danger and stand boldly against it, while protecting the nation’s pride, honor and sacred interests. At the time of elections, you will be granted power and the aims to proceed with the transformation.

    For example, at 1933 Nazi went into power establishing the Nazi Germany.
    1.The Nazi political platform emphasized the desire to resurrect the mighty historical past of the medieval holy roman empire, and regain the trampled German dignity from the end of WWI
    2.The common enemy was the Jewish people and its devious plan to rule the world, especially the goal being Germany’s national subversion
    3.The Nazis promised strong, authoritarian government in lieu of effete parliamentary republicanism, restored national pride (principally by repudiating the Versailles Treaty), and racial cleansing, all in name of national unity and solidarity, rather than the partisan divisions of democracy, and the social class divisiveness of Marxism.
    4.this transition has taken several years (1933-1939), but at the end, all of Germany, starting from key positions until the regular people, were at the control of the party
    5.The Reichstag fire was an arson attack on the Reichstag building in Berlin on 27 February 1933 just prior to the elections. The event is seen as pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany. The fire was used as evidence by the Nazis that the Communists were beginning a plot against the German government

    Another, more recent example, is the Islamic revolution in Iran, where religion is the base of the revolution.

    One must learn history in order not to follow it again…

  2. James says:

    I think that in the case of Turkey, your to-do list would stumble on item 4, if not 3. Turkey is an increasingly healthy democracy – they may be united in their rejection of Israel at the moment, but that’s actually quite a rarity. There are plenty of other matters over which they disagree – and as my post today indicates, support for the oppositon is on an upward trend.

  3. Steve Bebb says:

    Something tells me that the anonymous poster may be ever so slightly pro Israel? however i also note with interest the references to nazi Germany. Here are a couple of other similarities to ponder.Expansion into the occupied territories, wasn’t this once called lebensraum? Wasn’t there a big wall built in Warsaw hemming the population into a ghetto?, now where have i seen another wall like that i wonder…

  4. Anonymous says:

    Steve Bebb, you are an anti-Semite. Do not DARE invoke Nazism or compare Jews to Nazis, you filth.

  5. Now I am going to do my breakfast, after having my breakfast coming over again to read more news.

    My web-site … Executive Suites Inc San Francisco

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *